Cases 31 - 40 of 203
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION ("FANNIE MAE") v. HEINE et al
as 2:2018cv09875
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION ("FANNIE MAE")
Defendant:
ELLEN HEINE, HEINE, BARBARA ANN MCCARTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHIRLEY BROWN et al
as 3:2018cv09684
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHIRLEY BROWN, MR. BROWN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. BRUNDAGE et al
as 2:2018cv05099
Defendant:
ERIC D. BRUNDAGE, MARGO BRUNDAGE, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SW PARTNERS LLC v. WRENNIAN INVESTMENT GROUP LLC et al
as 1:2018cv04258
Defendant:
WRENNIAN INVESTMENT GROUP LLC, TALL PINES AT MASON RUN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
SW PARTNERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 2.35 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.74 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-31-10 et al
as 3:2018cv02014
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 2.35 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.74 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-31-10, PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 2.60 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 1.86 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-19-21, DAN MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.65 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.28 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-31-4 et al
as 3:2018cv01973
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.65 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.28 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-31-4, THEODORE BENCH, JR., EUNICE BENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 2.11 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 4.10 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIOP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-14-16 et al
as 3:2018cv02003
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 2.11 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 4.10 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIOP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-14-16, CHRISTOPHER KROESE, COUNTY OF HUNTERDON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.06 CRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.35 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-92-1.01 et al
as 3:2018cv01974
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.06 CRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.35 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-92-1.01, FRIENDS OF HOPEWELL VALLEY OPEN SPACE, TOWNSHIP OF HOPEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.48 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-19-25.04 et al
as 3:2018cv01990
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.48 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-19-25.04, WILLIAM EMBLEY, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 4.48 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 8.29 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-9 et al
as 3:2018cv02001
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 4.48 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 8.29 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-9, RONALD KAPPUS, JOHANNA KAPPUS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
