Cases 51 - 60 of 114
Jordan v. Yale Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03390
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Jordan, Jr.
Defendant:
Yale Mortgage Corporation and US Bank National Association
Counter_claimant:
Yale Mortgage Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Charles W. Jordan, Jr.
Wingo v. U. S. Bank Home Mortgage et al
as 2:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Wingo
Defendant:
U. S. Bank Home Mortgage, Commerce Street Holdings, LLC, Commerce Street Pantheon Mortgage Asset Securitizations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stanberry v. US Bank et al
as 1:2012cv02304
Plaintiff:
William Stanberry
Defendant:
US Bank and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FAULCONER v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC et al
as 5:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
NANCY FAULCONER
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC , HOME AMERICA MORTGAGE INC , US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dharamrup v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv02033
Plaintiff:
Ashish C Dharamrup
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and US Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Payne v. US Bank, NA
as 1:2012cv01862
Plaintiff:
Angeline L. Payne
Defendant:
US Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Lewis v. US Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv01495
Plaintiff:
John Lewis
Defendant:
US Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv01466
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Williams
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and US Bank National Association
Broughton v. US Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv01432
Plaintiff:
William Broughton
Defendant:
US Bank, N.A., SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bennett v. US Bank National Association et al
as 1:2012cv01164
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
US Bank National Association , 3 Point Asset Management, CitiMortgage Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
