Cases 61 - 70 of 70
USA (Rural Development) v. Doe et al
as 3:2009cv01042
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. DOE et al
as 3:2009cv01039
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Housing & Urban Development) v. Doe, et.al.
as 3:2009cv01040
Plaintiff:
USA (Housing & Urban Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. John Doe et al
as 3:2008cv02150
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Roe, Ruben Dario Rodriguez-Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. DOE et al
as 3:2008cv01644
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. John Doe et al.
as 3:2008cv01631
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv01469
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Housing & Urban Development) v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv01417
Plaintiff:
USA (Housing & Urban Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA(Farms Service Agency) v. Lopez-Ruiz
as 3:2008cv01035
Plaintiff:
USA(Farms Service Agency)
Defendant:
Jose Antonio Lopez-Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA (Rural Development) v. Mercado-Olmeda et al
as 3:2007cv01535
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
Reinerio Mercado-Olmeda, Marta Ivette Montalvo-Olivera and Conjugal Partnership Mercado-Montalvo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
