Real Property Cases filed in California
Cases 81 - 90 of 96
MFC TWIN BUILDERS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company v. FAJARDO et al
as 1:2012at00079
Plaintiff: MFC TWIN BUILDERS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant: HENRY DOLOSO FAJARDO and JK DENTAL CLINIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newhouse et al v. Aurora Bank FSB We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00223
Plaintiff: Michelle Newhouse , Richard Newhouse , Darlene Alcala and others
Defendant: Aurora Bank FSB , Aurora Loan Services, LLC, a limited liability corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suzanne Marie Martine v. Wells Fargo Bank N A et al
as 2:2012cv00721
Defendant: 123 Banking Associations, ABC Limited Liability Companies, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff: Suzanne Marie Martine
Kings Valley Industries, a California corporation v. Stockton Ingredient Services, Corp., a California corporation et al
as 1:2011at00590
Plaintiff: Kings Valley Industries, a California corporation
Defendant: Stockton Ingredient Services, Corp., a California corporation, International Quality Ingredients, a Netherlands limited liability company, Farm Brands Limited, a New Zealand limited liability company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Myers v. ENCORE CREDIT, a Delaware corporation et al
as 2:2011at00918
Defendant: ENCORE CREDIT, a Delaware corporation, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Richard S Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodwin v. California Reconveyance Company et al
as 2:2009at01848
Plaintiff: Mae Helen Goodwin
Defendant: California Reconveyance Company, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. an acquirer of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank from the FDIC acting as Receiver, erroneously sued as "Chase Bank" and WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type: Real Property None
JENSEN v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FDIC ACTING AS RECEIVER, erroneously sued as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA., as successor by me
as 1:2009at00799
Defendant: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FDIC ACTING AS RECEIVER, erroneously sued as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA., as successor by me
Plaintiff: DAVID E JENSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Real Property None
v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., An Acquirer Of Certain Assets And Liabilities Of Washington Mutual Bank From The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Acting As Receiver
as 2:2009at01497
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., An Acquirer Of Certain Assets And Liabilities Of Washington Mutual Bank From The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Acting As Receiver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type: Real Property None
MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Alameda Chemical & Scientific, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv04270
Plaintiff: MTGLQ Investors, L.P. and MTGLQ Investors, L.P.
Defendant: Alameda Chemical & Scientific, Inc., Alameda Chemical & Scientific of Arizona, Inc., Alameda Chemical & Scientific of Idaho, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Real Property None
v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FDIC ACTING AS RECEIVER et al
as 1:2009at00703
Defendant: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FDIC ACTING AS RECEIVER, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FDIC ACTING AS RECEIVER, California Reconveyance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?