Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Vaughan v. NewRez LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
Brian Vaughan
Defendant:
NewRez LLC fka New Penn Financial, LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Bridge Loan Venture V Trust, NewRez LLC formerly known as New Penn Financial LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sage Kupresanin, LLC et al v. Bridge SFR Loans, LLC
as 5:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Sage Kupresanin, LLC, Encanto Hynek, LLC, Lincoln Stidwill, LLC and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Bridge SFR Loans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Bridges et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 4:2017cv01429
Plaintiff:
James Bridges and Janet Burtzlaff
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Bridges and Heather Kaake Bridges
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv00635
Defendant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engels, LLP., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Miriam Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 5.59 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS et al
as 7:2008cv00274
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
5.59 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS and Sam R. Sparks, L.P., successor in interest in Sam R. Sparks, Inc. d/b/a B & P Bridge Company
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.96 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.96 Acres of Land, More or Less, The Brownsville and Matamoros Bridge Company, CT Corporation System and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
