Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AMSBRY v. RIDEOUT
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GREGORY AMSBRY
Defendant:
CHARLES A RIDEOUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JORGENSEN v. JORGENSEN et al
as 2:2022cv00397
Defendant:
KATHY JORGENSEN, PETER JORGENSEN, ANNE KATHERINE JORGENSEN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT JORGENSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SELENE FINANCE LP v. HOWE et al
as 1:2019cv00200
Defendant:
THERESA M HOWE, TERESA M HOWE and GREGORY HOWE
Plaintiff:
SELENE FINANCE LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. TURNER et al
as 1:2019cv00087
Defendant:
GREGORY R TURNER, LAURA A HAMM, GREGORY TURNER and others
Interested Party:
WASHINGTON HANCOCK COMMUNITY AGENCY, CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA NA, BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. BREEZY HILL FARMS INC et al
as 1:2014cv00417
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
BREEZY HILL FARMS INC and GREGORY E BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HARRIMAN et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIMAN and KATHRYN HARRIMAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
USA v. HARRIMAN et al
as 1:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
GREGORY HARRIMAN, KATHRYN HARRIMAN and UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS
Counter_claimant:
KATHRYN HARRIMAN and GREGORY HARRIMAN
Counter_defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HARRIMAN et al v. USA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A HARRIMAN and KATHRYN P HARRIMAN
Defendant:
USA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. HARRIMAN et al
as 1:2009cv00348
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
GREGORY A HARRIMAN and KATHRYN P HARRIMAN
Counter_claimant:
GREGORY A HARRIMAN and KATHRYN P HARRIMAN
Counter_defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
