Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Reaves v. Clemons et al
as 1:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Bianca D. Reaves
Defendant:
Chanae Q. Clemons, Levon Allen, Officer Jeff Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Price
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard
Defendant:
Katia Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BARFIELD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 5:2021cv00384
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC formerly known as LUZENAC AMERICA INC formerly doing business as RIO TINTO MINERALS INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BARFIELD and MELINDA BARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter et al v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Tina Carter and Howard Hopkins
Defendant:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
IH3 Property Borrower LP et al v. Howard
as 1:2019cv02648
Plaintiff:
IH3 Property Borrower LP, IH3 Property Georgia LP and Invitation Homes
Defendant:
Tiffany Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Staub v. Howard et al
as 1:2018cv04994
Defendant:
Tiffany Howard and Trent Howard
Plaintiff:
Timothy Staub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Pointe et al v. Howard
as 1:2018cv04355
Plaintiff:
The Pointe and Asden Management LLC
Defendant:
Sarita Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dayrise Residential v. Howard
as 1:2017cv01645
Plaintiff:
Dayrise Residential
Defendant:
Shanterri Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R by MCM Capital Partners, LLC v. Howard et al
as 1:2016cv00698
Plaintiff:
Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R by MCM Capital Partners LLC
Defendant:
Willard L. Howard and Ralencia S. Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Nevins Lewbel Property Management Inc. v. Howard
as 1:2015cv04275
Plaintiff:
Nevins Lewbel Property Management Inc.
Defendant:
Vanetta Howard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
