Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BELTRAN v. RITCHINGS et al
as 2:2023cv02000
Counter Claimant:
JUSTEENIA BELTRAN
Counter Defendant:
KRISTIN RITCHINGS ESQ., BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, XUANXUAN WEI ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LEE v. U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE
as 1:2017cv04570
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE
Defendant:
U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LEE et al v. FEIN, SUCH, KAHN & SHEPARD, P.C.
as 2:2017cv03516
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE and CHAUNTELLE LEE
Defendant:
FEIN, SUCH, KAHN & SHEPARD, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KEON HEE LEE v. BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2015cv01797
Plaintiff:
KEON HEE LEE
Defendant:
BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES, OHA NEWBURY VENTURES LP, VENTURES TRUST 2013-1-H-R (S3) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEE v. BOFI FEDERAL BANK, FSB et al
as 2:2015cv00498
Plaintiff:
CHEUN K. LEE
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and BOFI FEDERAL BANK, FSB.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. LEE et al
as 3:2014cv04432
Plaintiff:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Defendant:
SANG JIK LEE, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. AS NOMINEE FOR COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A., STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARCH BAY HOLDINGS, LLC- SERIES 2010B v. HEIDINGER et al
as 2:2013cv01227
Plaintiff:
ARCH BAY HOLDINGS, LLC- SERIES 2010B
Defendant:
REGINA R. HEIDINGER, HEIDINGER, DEMETRIA GUIUAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
GASKINS v. COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB et al
as 2:2012cv06682
Plaintiff:
JERRY LEE GASKINS
Defendant:
COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
SCHOLES et al v. MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA INC
as 2:2007cv05634
Plaintiff:
JENI LEE SCHOLES
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
