Cases 1 - 6 of 6
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.46 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-54-5 et al
as 3:2018cv01866
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.46 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-54-5, HOWARD C. LOPSHIRE, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PROVIDENCE SQUARE v. GAYNOR
as 3:2016cv07349
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE SQUARE
Defendant:
JUDITH GAYNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MACCAGNO v. PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, L.P. et al
as 2:2015cv05573
Plaintiff:
PIERRE MACCAGNO
Defendant:
PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING L.P. , NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.02-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00735
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.02-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, SIDNEY J. GOLDFARB, NAOMI VILKO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
REYES v. GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR GINNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2003-085 et al
as 2:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
ELVIS REYES
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR GINNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2003-085, THE PROVIDENT BANK, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC V. O.432 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, MIDDLESEX COUNTY,NEW JERSEY, ET AL.
as 2:2014cv05106
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.432 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, 125 JACKSON AVENUE, LLC and THE PROVIDENT BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
