Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gough-Bahash v. Citizens Bank, N.A. f/k/a RBS Citizens N.A. by and through its National Lending Division, Citizen One Home Loans
as 4:2016cv11785
Plaintiff:
Pamela Gough-Bahash
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, N.A. f/k/a RBS Citizens N.A. by and through its National Lending Division, Citizen One Home Loans
Kress v. Citizens Bank N.A., et al
as 2:2015cv14078
Plaintiff:
Lara Kress
Defendant:
Citizens Bank N.A., formerly known as RBS Citizens, N.A., successor by merger to Charter One Bank and CCO Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Oakley v. RBS Citizens, N.A.
as 2:2015cv12441
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Oakley
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A. and Trott & Trott, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Oakley v. RBS Citizens Bank, N.A.
as 2:2015cv12081
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Oakley
Defendant:
RBS Citizens Bank, N.A.
Porter v. RBS Citizens Financial Group, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv13369
Plaintiff:
Ronda Porter
Defendant:
RBS Citizens Financial Group, Inc , CCO Mortgage and Charter One Bank
Berro v. RBS Citizens, NA et al
as 2:2013cv14028
Plaintiff:
Samuel Berro
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, NA , CCO Mortgage and Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Kloss et al v. RBS Citizens N.A.
as 1:2013cv12833
Plaintiff:
Alfred R. Kloss and Diana C. Kloss
Defendant:
RBS Citizens N.A.
Kloss v. RBS Citizens, NA
as 1:2013cv11025
Plaintiff:
Alfred R. Kloss and Diana C Kloss
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, NA
Wilson et al v. RBS Citizens, N.A., successor in interest to CCO Mortgage Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv11691
Plaintiff:
Charles A Wilson and Wanda Reid Wilson
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A., successor in interest to CCO Mortgage Corp. and Fannie Mae
RBS Citizens, N.A. v. Great Lakes Aggregates, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv15211
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Defendant:
Great Lakes Aggregates, LLC, Rockwood Quarry, LLC, Sylvania Minerals LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
