Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Toner v. National City Mortgage Co. et al
as 3:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Debra Toner
Defendant:
National City Mortgage Co., Select Portfolio Servicing, Richmond Monroe Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Richmond Housing Authority v. Clay
as 3:2021cv01289
Plaintiff:
Richmond Housing Authority
Defendant:
Francis Clay
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2305
Richmond Essex, L.P. v. Williams, et al
as 3:2019cv01951
Defendant:
Chanel Williams and Leilani Hunter
Plaintiff:
Richmond Essex, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Richmond v. Chevron Corp. et al
as 3:2018cv00732
Plaintiff:
City of Richmond
Defendant:
Chevron Corp. , Chevron U.S.A., Inc. , ExxonMobil Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richmond Essex, L.P. v. Sherman et al
as 4:2016cv05200
Plaintiff:
Richmond Essex, L.P.
Defendant:
Kenneth B. Sherman and Kathy A. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Barranca Way LP v. Jamesha C. Richmond et al
as 5:2016cv01673
Plaintiff:
Barranca Way LP
Defendant:
Does and Jamesha C. Richmond
Muhammad v. North Richmond Senior Housing, Inc
as 3:2015cv00629
Plaintiff:
James Karim Muhammad
Defendant:
North Richmond Senior Housing, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Montes et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv07941
Plaintiff:
Martha Alvarez, Juan Arguelles, Jorge Barrera and others
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Does, First American Corporation and others
Richmond Tanada v. Wachovia Mortgage FSB et al
as 2:2011cv02201
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Does and Wachovia Mortgage FSB
Plaintiff:
Richmond Tanada
Toll Bros Inc v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2008cv03682
Plaintiff:
Toll Bros Inc, Toll Bros Inc and Toll Bros Inc
Defendant:
City of Richmond and Richmond Redevelopment Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
