Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Oriental Bank v. Richards et al
as 3:2020cv00123
Plaintiff:
Oriental Bank
Defendant:
Richards Althea and Lola W. Roberts Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock Bank v. Charles Roberts
as 14-13274
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HANCOCK BANK, a Mississippi banking corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES W ROBERTS, an individual
Hancock Bank v. Hill Street, LLC, et al
as 14-13198
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HANCOCK BANK, a Mississippi banking corporation and WHITNEY BANK, f.k.a. Hancock Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
HILL STREET, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, LAKE G. RAY, JR., an individual, LAKE G. RAY, JR. FAMILY TRUST and others
:
SERVICE
Hancock Bank v. Hill Street, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
Hill Street, L.L.C., Lake G. Ray, Jr., Lake G. Ray, Jr. Family Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Roberts et al
as 5:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Billy W. Roberts and Lisa P. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Roberts, Jr. et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00606
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Roberts, Jr. and Tina S. Roberts
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Bank of America Corporation and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Roberts et al
as 1:2010cv07897
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
Michael W Roberts and Kristin J Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Martinez et, al
as 1:2007cv00259
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Roberts
Defendant:
Jaime Martinez and Magdalena Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Roberts v. Martinez et, al
as 2:2007cv00259
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Roberts
Defendant:
Jaime Martinez and Magdalena Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
