Cases 1 - 10 of 21
The Pointe, Asden Management LLC v. Cullum
as 1:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
The Pointe, Asden Management LLC
Defendant:
Perry Cullum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Home SFR Borrower IV, LLC v. Perry
as 1:2023cv02949
Plaintiff:
Home SFR Borrower IV, LLC
Defendant:
Hazel Ann Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Home SFR Borrower III, LLC v. Perry
as 1:2023cv02948
Plaintiff:
Home SFR Borrower III, LLC
Defendant:
Raven Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Saleem v. Tate et al.
as 1:2022cv01499
Plaintiff:
Ihsan Saleem doing business as Glenrose Gardens
Defendant:
And All Other Occupants
Petitioner:
Perry Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
TERAMORE DEVELOPMENT LLC et al v. CITY OF AMERICUS CITY COUNCIL et al
as 1:2020cv00264
Plaintiff:
TERAMORE DEVELOPMENT LLC, SPRING HILL LAND TRUST and PERRY BROTHERS OIL COMPANY INC
Defendant:
JUANITA WILSON, LOU CHASE, NELSON BROWN and others
Respondent:
CITY OF AMERICUS CITY COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierre Management Enterprises, Inc. v. Perry
as 1:2019cv04424
Defendant:
William D. Perry
Plaintiff:
Pierre Management Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brow v. Perry et al
as 1:2019cv03985
Defendant:
Rashad Romell Chisholm and Sagirah Perry
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Perry v. PNC Bank, NA et al
as 1:2018cv04585
Plaintiff:
Darryl E. Perry
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 100 Inclusive and PNC Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
AJ Riverside Gardens LLC v. Perry
as 1:2018cv00641
Plaintiff:
AJ Riverside Gardens LLC
Defendant:
Loretta Perry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WOP Carrington Court LLC v. Perry
as 1:2017cv05057
Plaintiff:
WOP Carrington Court LLC
Defendant:
Tionna Perry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
