Cases 91 - 100 of 5,175
FORE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67160
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN G. FORE and BARBARA FORE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODWIN v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67057
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ALBERT GOODWIN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66793
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. SMITH
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67168
Plaintiff:
MELVIN F. WILSON
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOLHEIN v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. et al
as 2:2011cv67194
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR VOLHEIN
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., H. K. PORTER COMPANY, SOUTHERN TEXTILE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNDERHILL et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67044
Plaintiff:
ELTON UNDERHILL and FRANCES UNDERHILL
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67199
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY B. KING
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC. and AMATEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAHF et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67013
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK T. NAHF and BESSIE R. NAHF
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARON v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67054
Plaintiff:
TONY MERRIELL AARON
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLTZCLAW v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67179
Plaintiff:
WOODROW HOLTZCLAW
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
