Cases 101 - 110 of 610
CRONE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64786
Plaintiff:
CARL T CRONE and RUTH CRONE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOX et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65973
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. FOX and RUTH E. FOX
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MALLOY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65835
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MALLOY and RUTH MALLOY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BECHER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65353
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P BECHER and MARCELLA RUTH BECHER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAUER et al v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv64669
Plaintiff:
DONALD H DAUER and RUTH A DAUER
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAMICIS et al v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv64978
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R DEAMICIS and RUTH DEAMICIS
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65281
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W HARRIS and RUTH A HARRIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK et al v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv64970
Plaintiff:
GERALD R COOK and RUTH COOK
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPETZ et al v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv65026
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E SPETZ and MARY RUTH SPETZ
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILGENBERG et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDURTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65430
Plaintiff:
ALBERT L. HILGENBERG and RUTH HILGENBERG
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDURTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
