Cases 101 - 107 of 107
GAMSKY v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv60489
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. GAMSKY and JOHN R. GAMSKY
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SIEGLER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv60527
Plaintiff:
ERWIN SIEGLER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, THE BF GOODRICH COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BEAUSEJOUR et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01794
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH G. BEAUSEJOUR and PATRICIA BEAUSEJOUR
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BOSTICK et al v. ANCO INSULATIONS INC et al
as 2:2007cv73976
Plaintiff:
LEEMON BOSTICK, LEEMON BOSTICK, COZA BOSTICK and others
Defendant:
ANCO INSULATIONS INC, FINA OIL & CHEMICAL COMPANY, FINA OIL & CHEMICAL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FERRARI et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBEGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv63880
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND FERRARI and LILA FERRARI
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBEGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CLARK v. A.W. CHESTERON, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00620
Plaintiff:
NEIL P. CLARK
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERON, INC., AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORP., ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Bogner, et al v. Airco Inc, et al
as 1:2002cv01157
Defendant:
The American Chemistry Council, Polyone Corporation, Zeneca Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce E Bogner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
