Cases 121 - 130 of 253
STONE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65057
Plaintiff:
WALTER STONE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZEIGLER et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66143
Plaintiff:
ERNEST ZEIGLER and MADELINE ZEIGLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., A. W.CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2001cv66177
Plaintiff:
SARAH GRAHAM
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOLTZ v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64919
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHRISTOPHER STOLTZ
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65138
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN H KELLEY
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILL et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65230
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EMORY GILL and MARGARET C GILL
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINSTON v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65200
Plaintiff:
LENORA WINSTON
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NADOLNY et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64099
Plaintiff:
EUGENE W. NADOLNY and MARIE NADOLNY
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FEDERAL-MOGUL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LODGE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64045
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS LODGE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION , PENN CENTRAL RAILROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KLUPZAK v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62740
Plaintiff:
JOHANNA KLUPZAK
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
