Cases 121 - 130 of 254
KENT et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65928
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH F. KENT, SR. and MARGUERITE KENT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN ZANDT v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET AL
as 2:2011cv66186
Plaintiff:
FRANCE A VAN ZANDT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NARDELLI v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64255
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY NARDELLI
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66177
Plaintiff:
SARAH GRAHAM
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLNER et al V. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv66164
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L MILLNER and BESSIE M MILLNER
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORCORAN et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65784
Plaintiff:
PATRICK CORCORAN and MARIE CORCORAN
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65998
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. STONE and MARY F. STONE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARTLETT et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65187
Plaintiff:
HAROLD BARTLETT and DONNA BARTLETT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LODGE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64045
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS LODGE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION , PENN CENTRAL RAILROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NADOLNY et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64099
Plaintiff:
EUGENE W. NADOLNY and MARIE NADOLNY
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FEDERAL-MOGUL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
