Cases 121 - 130 of 149
Smith et al v. Walgreen Company et al
as 4:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Cecilya Smith , Shamarious Bush, Sr. and Shamarious Bush, Jr
Defendant:
Walgreen Company , Walgreen National Corporation and Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Bustamente v. Walgreen Co
as 3:2012cv05010
Plaintiff:
Santos Bustamente
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Eaves vs Walgreen Co
as 2:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
Pattisue Eaves
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oliveri v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2012cv04361
Plaintiff:
Julio Oliveri, M.D.
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bartz v. Walgreen National Corporation
as 6:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
MD Reed Bartz
Defendant:
Walgreen National Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rocamontes v. Walgreen Co.
as 5:2012cv00786
Plaintiff:
Susan Rocamontes
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Behrends v. Clark et al
as 1:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Reba Behrends
Defendant:
Kevin Clark and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
B. v. Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., et al
as 2:2011cv00367
Plaintiff:
J. L. B.
Defendant:
AMO (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd., AMO (Shanghai) Medical Devices Trading Co., Ltd., Walgreen Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steans v. Walgreen National Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv02896
Plaintiff:
Kevin Steans
Defendant:
Walgreen National Corporation and Unnamed Walgreen Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ryan et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2011cv00878
Plaintiff:
Barry Ryan and Terry Ryan
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
