Cases 131 - 140 of 446
Hotomanie v. Adkins et al
as 1:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Does I-V, Archie Adkins and MS Directional, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rory V. Hotomanie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butts v. Stricker et al
as 1:2020cv00112
Defendant:
John Doe, Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company and Rachel L Stricker
Plaintiff:
Stacy Butts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brock et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv00096
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and John Does I-V
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brock and Sandra Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Creel v. Loy et al
as 9:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Mark G. Loy, Does 1-10, Active Truck Transport, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Creel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adamson v. East Penn Logistics et al
as 4:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Larry Allen Warner and East Penn Logistics
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wagner v. Addus Healthcare (Idaho), Inc et al
as 4:2020cv00041
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and Addus Healthcare (Idaho), Inc
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barton v. Arrow Striping & Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Arrow Striping & Manufacturing, Inc., Skip-Line, LLC and Does 1 through 30
Plaintiff:
Jennifer R. Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mahar v. Russell Country Investors et al
as 4:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Edgell Building, Does 1-15, Blackfoot Custom Builders and others
Plaintiff:
Una Louise Mahar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Andrews et al v. McFarland et al
as 1:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Brenna Andrews and McKennah Andrews
Defendant:
David McFarland, Does I-V and Knight Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weinberg v Walmart Stores, Inc., et al
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Walmart Stores, Inc., Store No. 2455 and ABC Companies 1-3
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Weinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
