Cases 171 - 180 of 2,345
Platt et al v. Erv's Automotive Services et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Cory Ersel Platt and Michelle Platt
Defendant:
Samuel Albert Wisner and Erv's Automotive Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
White v. PacifiCorp et al
as 2:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Jennifer White
Defendant:
PacifiCorp doing business as Rocky Mountain Power and Lance K Meek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bohler v. C.R. England
as 2:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Elliot Bohler
Defendant:
C.R. England
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Schaerrer et al v. Schroeder Expedite
as 2:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Stephen L Schaerrer and Jerrie Schaerrer
Defendant:
Schroeder Expedite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Haynes et al v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Roberta Haynes and Rick Haynes
Defendant:
M.D. Rhett Roger Smith, M.D. Roger Hal Smith, Rhett Roger Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Loosle v. General Motors
as 2:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ashlee M Loosle
Defendant:
General Motors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Collett v. FedEx Custom Critical et al
as 1:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Kathy Collett
Defendant:
FedEx Custom Critical and Sara J. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Adams v. Home Depot
as 2:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
David Adams
Defendant:
Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Olden v. Johnson
as 2:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Sharon Olden
Defendant:
Logan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Bullock v. Vechirko
as 2:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Abbie Bullock
Defendant:
Anatoliy Vechirko doing business as Eagle Creek Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
