Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Pierce v. E & E Foods Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ernest Todd Pierce
Defendant:
E & E Foods Corporation , Double E Foods LLC and Cape Greig LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Van Rooyen v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Lane E. Van Rooyen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cabales et al v. Morgan et al
as 4:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jaclyn Cabales and Jonathan Cabales
Defendant:
Albert E. Morgan, Arctic Chiropractic Bethel, LLC and Christopher F. Twiford
Thirdparty_defendant:
United States of America
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Arctic Chiropractic Bethel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schambeck v. Flores
as 3:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Josette R. Schambeck
Defendant:
Patrisia E. Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr et al v. Tolbert et al
as 3:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Rudy H. Barr and Wallace D. Powers
Defendant:
Marshall E. Tolbert , Anchorage Neurosurgical Associates, Inc. , Susanne E. Fix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Corrections Corp. of America
as 3:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Brown
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Kasayuli et al v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kasayuli , Evelyn Kasayuli , J. K. and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Long v. Darmer
as 3:2012cv00182
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Long
Defendant:
Roman E. Darmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Handy v. Zimmer, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Handy
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bertacini et al v. U.S.A.
as 3:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Bertacini and Daena E. Bertacini
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
