Cases 11 - 20 of 2,090
CAPEN et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63203
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAPEN and MARILYN CAPEN
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GERACE et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62734
Plaintiff:
GLADYS GERACE
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Garnishee:
CAREY CANADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZIELENSKI et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63201
Plaintiff:
THEODORE ZIELENSKI and ROSE ZIELENSKI
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REILLY v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62785
Plaintiff:
HOWARD REILLY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSSI et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63213
Plaintiff:
ALDEN ROSSI and JANE ROSSI
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONNELLY et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63251
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CONNELLY, SR. and ANNE CONNELLY
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REESE et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63200
Plaintiff:
ROBERT REESE and JOAN REESE
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COULOMBE v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63190
Plaintiff:
LUCIEN COULOMBE
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BYRAM v. A.W. CHESTERTON et al
as 2:2010cv68753
Plaintiff:
DORA D. BYRAM
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON , ARMSTRONG WORLD , ASBESTOSPRAY CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KISSINGER v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68719
Plaintiff:
RUTH KISSINGER
Defendant:
A C & S INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD , ASBESTOSPRAY CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
