Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Bell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04562
Plaintiff:
Rinicka M. Bell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01721
Plaintiff:
OSCAR JAMES BELL
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cinea v. Lee-Bell Transport Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Guillio Cinea
Defendant:
Lee-Bell Transport Inc., David Winters, Damario Bloodson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bell v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv04919
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Bell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04414
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv03159
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02436
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02035
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv01070
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Catherine Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell III v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00862
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Leonard Bell III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
