Cases 11 - 20 of 23,998
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03263
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Criswell et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
Francene Criswell and Randy Criswell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leventman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03271
Plaintiff:
Kathleen W Leventman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Redmon et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03274
Plaintiff:
Robert Redmon and Alanna Shelton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fioravanti v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04285
Plaintiff:
Patricia Fioravanti
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Astacio v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03246
Plaintiff:
Julio Astacio
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crocker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03234
Plaintiff:
Barbara Crocker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fansler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03244
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fansler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Castillo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03245
Plaintiff:
Ronald Castillo
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hart v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03241
Plaintiff:
Karleen D Hart
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
