Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Clark County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv01616
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Holper Out-Patients Medical Center, Ltd, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Clark County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Nevada CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C.
as 2:2019cv01554
Plaintiff:
Atom Miller
Defendant:
Nevada CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lama v. Nevada CVS Pharmacy LLC
as 2:2018cv02006
Plaintiff:
Tony Lama
Defendant:
Nevada CVS Pharmacy LLC dba CVS Pharmacy #8789 and Nevada CVS Pharmacy LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Long v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00300
Defendant:
CVS NV Holding Company, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS RX Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Long v. CVS Pharmacy Inc
as 2:2018cv01099
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Singh et al v. Glenmark Phargenerics, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00154
Defendant:
Glenmark Phargenerics, Inc. and Nevada CVS Pharmacy, LLC
Plaintiff:
Heather Singh and Navjot "Jody" Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baymiller et al v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00858
Defendant:
Aurobindo Pharma USA, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Glaxosmithkline LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Lynn Baymiller, Mary Arlayne Baymiller and Scott A Baymiller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Batlle et al v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al
as 2:2008cv01184
Plaintiff:
Olga Batlle, Luis Batlle and Omar Batlle
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa LLC, CVS Pharmacy Inc, Agnes Mortel and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Fields v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv01444
Plaintiff:
Reginald Fields
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
