Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Evans v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02271
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cecile Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv03775
Plaintiff:
Cecil R. Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cecil v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03364
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marion Cecil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burbank v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv03222
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Cecil Burbank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02056
Plaintiff:
Cecil Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coos County et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019op46136
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mark Timney, Michael P. Dipre and others
Plaintiff:
Coos County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carroll County v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019op46137
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mark Timney, Michael P. Dipre and others
Plaintiff:
Carroll County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01306
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cecil Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2019op45026
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Sackler, Paulo Costa, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humble v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01289
Plaintiff:
CECIL HUMBLE
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
