Cases 11 - 20 of 81
BATEMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05287
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BATEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCOTT-REESE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23423
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT-REESE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOLAND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22780
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BOLAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOWERY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22554
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT LOWERY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15339
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13360
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HOGAN and CHRISTOPHER S HOGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Javens et al v. Fresenius Medical Care International et al
as 3:2022cv00666
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care, Fresenius Medical Care International, Fresenius Medical Care North America and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Javens, Jean McClellan Chambers and Others Similarly Situated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Peck et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01259
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Peck and Alecia Ann Peck
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARRINGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59441
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT GARRINGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANCOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49967
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HANCOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
