Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Briggs v. LaGrange Art Museum, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Karen Anne Briggs
Defendant:
LaGrange Art Museum, Inc. , Cindy Fulks , Leigh Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Weiskopf et al v. Wang et al
as 1:2017cv01515
Plaintiff:
Jean Weiskopf and Cindy Weiskopf
Defendant:
Shaojie Wang , Y&L Service, Inc. and Allied Property And Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brock et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01178
Plaintiff:
Cindy Brock and Randy Brock
Defendant:
C. R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bentley v. Harrison et al
as 1:2015cv02950
Plaintiff:
Cindi J. Bentley
Defendant:
David Harrison and Peggy B. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BAKER v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as 4:2014cv00175
Plaintiff:
CINDY LOU BAKER
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worden v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
CINDY E. WORDEN
Defendant:
MENTOR CORPORATION and MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DENNIS et al v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00189
Plaintiff:
CINDY DENNIS and ROBERT DENNIS
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and MENTOR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
Cindy L. Williams
Defendant:
MENTOR CORPORATION and MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beasley et al v. Cornerstone Detention Products, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Beasley and Cindy Beasley
Defendant:
Cornerstone Detention Products, Inc. and Cornerstone Institutional, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
BARBER et al v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as 4:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
CINDY BARBER and STEVE BARBER
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
