Cases 11 - 20 of 37
CUEVAS-CARDOZA et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37897
Plaintiff:
LOUIS E. CUEVAS-CARDOZA and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CUEVAS v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06340
Plaintiff:
BETTY CUEVAS
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CUEVAS v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80623
Plaintiff:
HERBERT CUEVAS and ELSIE CUEVAS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUEVAS v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv80511
Plaintiff:
HONOR RAY CUEVAS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUEVAS v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79585
Plaintiff:
LACY J. CUEVAS, SR.
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC., H. K. PORTER, INC., GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUEVAS v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79743
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR CUEVAS
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC. and FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUEVAS v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79087
Plaintiff:
CRAYTON CUEVAS
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUEVAS-MALAVE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70142
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CUEVAS-MALAVE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUEVAS-MALAVE V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35264
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CUEVAS-MALAVE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CUEVAS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31767
Plaintiff:
LUIS S. CUEVAS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
