Cases 11 - 20 of 21
ANDREWS et al v. RAM MEDICAL INC et al
as 7:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ANDREWS and CONSTANT ANDREWS
Defendant:
RAM MEDICAL INC, MEDLINE INDUSTRIES INC , CR BARD INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Farmer v. DAVOL. Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02709
Plaintiff:
Patricia Farmer
Defendant:
DAVOL. Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heuett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Timothy Clyde Heuett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sapp v. Davol Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00286
Plaintiff:
Richard W Sapp
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brewton Clark v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02440
Plaintiff:
Elnora E. Brewton Clark
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sandra Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Diehl v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
Patsy Diehl
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type:
Torts - Injury
Rumph v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jerry Glenn Rumph, Jr
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cofer et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
W. Frank Cofer and Camille Cofer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Curott et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02456
Plaintiff:
Edward Curott, Sr., Edward Curott, Sr., Colleen Curott and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
