Cases 11 - 20 of 273
Williamson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
Donna Williamson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Webster v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Donna Webster
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cantu v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Donna Cantu
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Donna Sue Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mcknight-Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Donna Mcknight-Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cheesman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Donna Cheesman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall et al v. DuPont De NeMours, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HALL and DONNA HALL
Defendant:
DuPont De NeMours, Inc., The Chemours Company and E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marklinsky v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Donna Marklinsky
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Corbley v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Donna Corbley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harrison v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
DONNA HARRISON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
