Cases 11 - 20 of 149
Parker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Gregory Parker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liguori v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05569
Plaintiff:
Roseanne Liguori
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ciampa v. C. R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05568
Plaintiff:
Philip Ciampa
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Ethicon Inc, Davol Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05108
Plaintiff:
David Garman
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc., Atrium Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04999
Plaintiff:
Lynn McLaughlin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stivers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05000
Plaintiff:
Tom Stivers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hemmerle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05001
Plaintiff:
Frederick Hemmerle
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04069
Plaintiff:
Renee Carlson and Gregory Carlson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubble et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00430
Plaintiff:
Winona G Hubbell, Theodore A Hubbell, Theodore Hubble and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03804
Plaintiff:
Matthew Morrill
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
