Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Fogle v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv00431
Defendant:
Christiana Rivera-Magda, United States Postal Service and USA
Plaintiff:
Brian Fogle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09043
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY FOGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18571
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DON CHADWICK FOGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv17448
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN FOGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15797
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON FOGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06940
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FOGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49831
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID FOGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv24431
Plaintiff:
TYLER FOGLE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07681
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN FOGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60964
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN FOGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
