Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Gordon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01053
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Jaime Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Dunbar et al
as 4:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Anthony Lowvel Dunbar, AIG Prop. Casualty Company, Evans Delivery Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 1:2020cv04355
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nicole F. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GORDON v. ROWLEY et al
as 4:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
BUSHRA GORDON
Defendant:
U.S. National Bank Association and BRIAN ROWLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Henderson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2020cv01050
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Gordon Henderson and Dawn Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lori Gordon
Defendant:
National Seating & Mobility, Inc. and Pride Mobility Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAPMAN et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP et al
as 1:2019cv00222
Plaintiff:
GORDON CHAPMAN and BONNIE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP, STRYKER CORP and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP doing business as STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Dominic et al
as 1:2019cv05182
Defendant:
Gordon Steven Dominic and C & K Trucking, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jerome Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv04762
Plaintiff:
Karen Leah Gordon
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Britt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01941
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Gordon Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
