Cases 11 - 18 of 18
KEAN et al v. CEDAR WORKS PLAYSETS! et al
as 2:2019cv06583
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH KEAN, THOMAS KEAN and RHONDA KEAN
Defendant:
CEDAR WORKS PLAYSETS!, DEF CORP. (1-5), ABC CORP. (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv17643
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-5 (fictitious names), JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious names), WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
RICE v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv12077
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP., WALMART, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOULTON v. FEDEX et al
as 3:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MOULTON
Defendant:
FEDEX, FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious names) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
TAGGART v. JOHNSON SMITH COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN TAGGART
Defendant:
JOHNSON SMITH COMPANY , DCI/DECOR CRAFT INC., JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious names) and others
Cross_claimant:
JOHNSON SMITH COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
ABC, INC. 5-10 (fictitious names), DCI/DECOR CRAFT INC., JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious names) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUBE v. HOLLAND et al
as 2:2011cv01204
Plaintiff:
TROY A. DUBE
Defendant:
SCOTT ANDREW HOLLAND , U.S. XPRESS, INC. , ABC COMPANIES 1-5 (fictitious entities) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHIPLEY v. AMTRAK RAILROAD et al
as 2:2010cv04456
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SHIPLEY, JR.
Defendant:
AMTRAK RAILROAD, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., , JOHN DOES (1-5) fictitiously names individuals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RODRIGUEZ v. SINOW et al
as 2:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
JOHN SINOW, MOTOR CARRIER SERVICES, EVELYN AGUILERA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
