Cases 11 - 20 of 276
CODAY v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67606
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY V. CODAY
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATTS et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67645
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE WATTS
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WORRELL v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67623
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. WORRELL
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANLEY et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67635
Plaintiff:
COLEY MANLEY and MAMIE LEE MANLEY
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOLDS et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv67638
Plaintiff:
GUY P. FOLDS and DIXIE D. FOLDS
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUTHRIE et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67649
Plaintiff:
QUITA GUTHRIE and DAVID GUTHRIE
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRIS et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67615
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY L. GARRIS and ETHEL GARRIS
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEGGETT et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67643
Plaintiff:
ESTELLE LEGGETT and BRUCE T LEGGETT
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67602
Plaintiff:
FORREST O. SMITH and PAULINE T. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAWYER v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67630
Plaintiff:
MARY ELLEN SAWYER
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
