Cases 11 - 20 of 337
BUSH et al v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv58096
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SAIMSON v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv58460
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SAIMSON
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, ET AL
as 2:2011cv58653
Plaintiff:
CARLOS C. MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION and FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MOORER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55974
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LITTLE v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC.
as 5:2011cv54006
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. LITTLE
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv57916
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROGGI v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 5:2011cv54253
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI BROGGI
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FOUNTAIN et al v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv57951
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv57808
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 5:2011cv54016
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
