Cases 11 - 20 of 447
Sprague v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65356
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Sprague
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Filing Error
as 1:2024sf65355
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Sprague
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lee Taylor
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Filing Error
as 1:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Sprague
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01757
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wynns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01761
Plaintiff:
Lee Wynns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doyle v. Johnson et al.
as 3:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Gerald Doyle
Defendant:
Brian Lee Johnson, V-Max Transportation, Inc. and Steelcase, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Elliot v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01535
Plaintiff:
Derek Lee Elliot
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Lee Lawson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
James Lee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
