Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Lopez et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mark Lopez and Mary Lopez
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma, Inc., aaiPharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2011md02308
Plaintiff:
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation, Melissa Kearnely, Richard Kearnely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lopez v. GGNSC Louisville St. Matthews LLC
as 3:2010cv00675
Plaintiff:
Anna Lopez
Defendant:
GGNSC Louisville St. Matthews LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Edwards et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brian Edwards, Brian Edwards, Gail Manthey and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Lopez v. BoAn Bike (Shenzhen) Company, Ltd. et al
as 7:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Lopez
Defendant:
BoAn Bike (Shenzhen) Company, Ltd. and Top Image International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. et al
as 3:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Yoe Lopez, Jr, Yoe Lopez, Jr and Yoe Lopez, Jr
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Vega-Lopez v. Stout et al
as 5:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Saul Vega-Lopez
Defendant:
Dorthy M. Stout, Dorthy M. Stout, Werner Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lopez-Gomez v. Hullett et al
as 1:2007cv00151
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Lopez-Gomez, Ricardo Lopez-Gomez and Ricardo Lopez-Gomez
Defendant:
Joe Hullett and Carol Hullett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
