Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Filing Error
as 1:2017cv02280
Petitioner:
Maurice Gales
Respondent:
Kimberly Clipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guy et al v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guy and Laura Guy
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and Maurice Waller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00918
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton et al v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Maurice D Norton , Sarah A. Harris, J D H, minor and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bechtold et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Bechtold , Cathy Beil, Nancy Begley and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pickett Jr. v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., et al.
as 1:2012dp23263
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pickett Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hetman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22383
Plaintiff:
Maurice Paul Hetman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pendleton et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20813
Plaintiff:
Maurice E. Pendleton and Linda Pendleton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
