Cases 11 - 18 of 18
MCMAHON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv05888
Plaintiff:
GARY MCMAHON
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMahon v. Port Imperial Ferry Corp.
as 2:2014cv04797
Plaintiff:
Terrence McMahon
Defendant:
PORT IMPERIAL FERRY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MCMAHON et al v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., et al
as 2:2014cv03178
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON J. MCMAHON and ERIKA MCMAHON
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVERINGHAM et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv03350
Plaintiff:
BRYAN EVERINGHAM , GREGORY GODISH , PATRICK M. GORMAN and others
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCMAHON v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv04994
Plaintiff:
SEAN P MCMAHON
Defendant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, GENERAL DYNAMICS ARMAMENT AND TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
MCMAHON v. TRUMP TAJ MAHAL CASINO HOTEL et al
as 1:2010cv04121
Plaintiff:
MARGARET MCMAHON
Defendant:
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL CASINO HOTEL, TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC., ABC COS. 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCMAHON et al v. MACK et al
as 2:2008cv04652
Plaintiff:
BRIEN J. MCMAHON, JR. and BRIDGET MCMAHON
Defendant:
RAYMOND M. MACK, PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION, ABRAHAM FREUND and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TINKER v. MENU FOODS, INC.
as 1:2007cv01468
Plaintiff:
LINDA TINKER, GAIL BRYAN, SUSAN HANCE-GOODMAN and others
Defendant:
MENU FOODS, INC., CHEMNUTRA, INC. and MENU FOODS INCOME FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
