Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Rice v. Turner et al
as 4:2017cv02684
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Rice
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Taggered Boyd, James Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grim v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02286
Plaintiff:
Eugene Neil Grim
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whaley v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01954
Plaintiff:
Neil Whaley
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huck v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01466
Plaintiff:
Neil F. Huck
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doll et al v. Home Depot, Inc., The et al
as 1:2014cv02848
Plaintiff:
Neil E Doll and Beulah Doll
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc., The , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and HD Development of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nutter v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02291
Plaintiff:
Neil Eugene Nutter
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02118
Plaintiff:
Gregory Neil Lewis
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollingsworth v. Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa et al
as 3:2014cv02019
Plaintiff:
Brett W. Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa , Neil A. McKnight and Campbell Soup Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Neil et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20186
Plaintiff:
Elaine O'Neil and William H. O'Neil, III
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shirley v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20550
Plaintiff:
Neil S. Shirley
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
