Cases 11 - 20 of 372
Turner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02711
Plaintiff:
Desi Dwayne Turner, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vera, Sr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02672
Plaintiff:
Jorge Vera, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calderone, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
Don Calderone, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Branham v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
Michael Branham, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02608
Plaintiff:
Larry Edwards, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lambert v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02536
Plaintiff:
James Lambert, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knight, Sr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02483
Plaintiff:
Earnest Knight, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holland, Sr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02498
Plaintiff:
Paul Holland, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65522
Plaintiff:
Mr. Daniel P. Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VanDorn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Plaintiff:
Jonathan VanDorn, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
