Cases 11 - 16 of 16
SMITH-DYKE v. DAISY MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv00459
Plaintiff:
LUCRETIA SMITH-DYKE
Defendant:
DAISY MANUFACTURING COMPANY , WAL-MART STORES INC and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FAIRBANK FARMS INC et al
as 2:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
ALICE SMITH
Defendant:
FAIRBANK FARMS INC and FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WSZOLEK v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L WSZOLEK
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , TRANE US INC , BURNHAM CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION , RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION , INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
A W CHESTERTON COMPANY, GARLOCK INC , INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CLARK et al v. TRANE US INC et al
as 2:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
DONALD CLARK , BETSEY CLARK and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Defendant:
TRANE US INC , AVCO CORPORATION , BIGELOW COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY and OWENS-ILLINOIS INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cross_claimant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY , OWENS-ILLINOIS INC , ROTH PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
CBS CORPORATION, CYCLOTHERM CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SHANNON v. SASSEVILLE
as 2:2008cv00343
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANNON
Defendant:
SARTO ANTHONY SASSEVILLE
Counter_claimant:
SARTO ANTHONY SASSEVILLE
Counter_defendant:
MICHAEL SHANNON
Movant:
ROBERT C VILAS , MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER AND SMITH , MARK PELLERIN and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SMITH v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC
as 2:2008cv00114
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E SMITH
Defendant:
FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
