Cases 11 - 19 of 19
ELAFNY v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv07780
Plaintiff:
SALWA ELAFNY
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, STARBUCKS AT WOODBRIDGE CENTER MALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MONTELBANO v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv05221
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Montelbano
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUMENTA v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv03319
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
Shannon Aumenta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COHEN v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2019cv02062
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I - X and STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SENIUS v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv11334
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION and JOHN DOES A-Z
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN SENIUS and PETER SENIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACLEOD v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv01819
Plaintiff:
DONALD MACLEOD
Defendant:
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY , ABC CORPORATIONS I-X, JOHN DOES I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CALDIS et al v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY et al
as 2:2014cv01394
Plaintiff:
GRANT CALDIS and INGRID TIERENS
Defendant:
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, STARBUCKS CORPORATION , JOHN DOE (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
METHWANI et al v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv04105
Plaintiff:
JAY METHWANI and JUDITH METHWANI
Defendant:
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, STARBUCKS CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cross_claimant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZORANSKI et al v. STARBUCKS et al
as 1:2011cv03519
Plaintiff:
MARIE ZORANSKI and EDWARD ZORANSKI
Defendant:
STARBUCKS, STARBUCKS CORPORATION, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
