Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Pierce v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01411
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. American National Red Cross Northeast Ohio Region et al
as 1:2017cv02129
Plaintiff:
Christine Pierce
Defendant:
American National Red Cross Northeast Ohio Region , Administrator Bureau of Workers' Compensation and Edward Leonardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierce v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02016
Plaintiff:
Janette M. Pierce
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01523
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Pierce
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
Lorena E. Pierce
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02223
Plaintiff:
Debra Lynn Pierce
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al.
as 1:2014dp20491
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Pierce and Teri Ann Pierce
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Durrani et al
as 1:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen and others
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. and Cincinnati Children's Hopital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Pierce v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2012dp21352
Plaintiff:
Judith Diane Pierce
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
