Cases 21 - 30 of 20,922
Odubhraic v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03342
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odubhraic
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03265
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lashelle Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03235
Plaintiff:
Raymond Noel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cavigliano et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03239
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cavigliano and Estate of Theresa Cavigliano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kirkman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03197
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ted Kirkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bolton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03073
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gordon Bolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sayers v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03057
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Sayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Momon, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02610
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Momon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patrick v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024oe02452
Plaintiff:
Downing Albert Patrick
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Powell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02450
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
