Cases 21 - 30 of 404
AUSTIN v. CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.,
as 2:2011cv57656
Plaintiff:
ELDRICK O. AUSTIN
Defendant:
CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SAWYER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56607
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS L. SAWYER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BIDDY v. CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
as 2:2011cv55488
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE R BIDDY
Defendant:
CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ALINGAS et al v. AMERICAN PETROLEUM TRANSPORT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv52284
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM TRANSPORT CORPORATION, AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD. , BALDBUTTE SHIPPING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
REYES v. CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
as 2:2011cv52190
Plaintiff:
ISAAC P REYES
Defendant:
CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HORSFORD v. CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
as 2:2011cv52415
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC HORSFORD
Defendant:
CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Quinones v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06325
Plaintiff:
Gil Quinones
Defendant:
Central Gulf Lines, Inc. , LMS Shipmanagement, Inc. and International Shipholding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GRAY v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45887
Plaintiff:
WALTER W. GRAY
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL, UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLLINGSWORTH v. CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
as 2:2011cv35354
Plaintiff:
LARRY D HOLLINGSWORTH
Defendant:
CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MELTON et al v. CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
as 2:2011cv39641
Plaintiff:
IRVING J MELTON, SR and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
