Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Kelly v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02366
Plaintiff:
Glenn R. Kelly
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curry v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01346
Plaintiff:
Glenn Curry
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pfeiffer v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01293
Plaintiff:
Glenn Pfeiffer
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Russell v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Glenn Russell
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doetsch v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01488
Plaintiff:
Glenn Doetsch
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thorn et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05543
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Thorn and Timothy Glenn Prentice
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05241
Plaintiff:
GLENN WHITMAN
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv04713
Plaintiff:
Glenn Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Looman et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04344
Plaintiff:
Glenn Looman and Lenore Looman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2021cv02796
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C. R. Bard and Becton Dickinson & Co
Plaintiff:
Glenn A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
